The one-sentence version
NSPEC is an autonomous frontend QA agent. You give it a URL; it returns tickets in your tracker, each one evidence-backed and independently reproduced.
What actually happens on a run
- You submit a URL (staging, preview, or production) and optional login.
- A network of specialist agents spins up in parallel, wielding 60+ QA primitives in isolated browser contexts.
- Coverage unfolds across six viewports, from desktop 1440 down to mobile portrait 390.
- Every finding is handed off to a verifier agent that reproduces it in a fresh browser, up to three times.
- Third-party noise is filtered server-side · GA errors, Sentry retries, font 404s, ad-tech CORS, duplicate screenshots.
- Survivors get filed directly into Jira, Linear, or GitHub Issues over MCP · complete with title, repro, acceptance criteria, severity, owner, and an evidence bundle.
What you never have to do
- Write a selector.
- Maintain a selector.
- Babysit a CI matrix.
- Read a 300-item crawler report to find three real bugs.
- Copy screenshots into a ticket by hand.
Who it's for
Teams who ship frontend on a fast cadence and are tired of "green CI, red prod". Especially:
- Engineering managers who want QA coverage without hiring a QA team.
- Frontend engineers who maintain flaky E2E suites and hate it.
- Solo founders shipping consumer products who need a second pair of eyes at every deploy.
- Agencies shipping client work who want a defensible QA receipt on every handoff.
Trust architecture
- Verifier-first. No bug ships without an independent repro.
- Evidence-bundled. Every ticket includes highlighted screenshot, full-page capture, DOM snapshot, console log, network trace, and the verifier's confidence score.
- Project memory. Known false positives and flaky selectors are learned across runs, so you stop getting the same non-bug reported every Tuesday.
- Risk-biased. If you opt in, NSPEC reads your git diff and weights attention toward the surfaces you just touched.
Go deeper: How it works · Features · Pricing · FAQ